Ranking Methodology
Our rankings are designed as a buyer shortlist, not a complete market census.
What we evaluate
We look at public methodology, GEO specialization, service fit, technical depth, content and authority-building capability, evidence quality, and whether the provider appears relevant to AI search visibility use cases.
How scores work
Scores are editorial assessments based on public signals. They are not mathematical guarantees, customer satisfaction scores, or performance promises.
A higher rank means the provider appears stronger for the comparison criteria used on this site, not that it is the best fit for every buyer.
Evidence standard
We prefer company-owned pages, public methodology, case studies, product documentation, third-party listings, and credible media or announcement pages. Unsourced performance claims should be treated as prompts for further due diligence.
Update process
Rankings may change as companies publish new evidence, adjust service offerings, or correct inaccurate information. Providers can submit corrections or additional evidence for review.